Articles

· Summary: Immunity: The Undelegated Fraud argues that governmental immunity doctrines — including judicial, prosecutorial, sovereign, qualified, and administrative immunity — lack lawful constitutional foundation because the People never delegated authority for government actors to exempt themselves from accountability under the law. The article contends that accountability is the essential condition of delegated authority and […]

· Summary: Betrayed by Counsel: Structural Collapse of the Constitutional Defense Function examines the gradual transformation of the American legal system from a constitutional framework grounded in delegated authority, jury participation, due process, and the law of the land into an increasingly administrative structure governed through procedural management, institutional continuity, and self-ratifying systems of authority. […]

The integrated bar is not merely a professional association. It is the operational mechanism through which legislative influence, executive enforcement, judicial administration, and procedural governance merge into a single institutional system insulated from meaningful constitutional accountability.

· Summary: Congressional Usurpation: The Fraud of Positive Law, Non-Positive Titles, and the Doctrine of Void Ab Initio argues that the modern federal government increasingly operates through systems of assumed authority rather than constitutionally delegated power. The article begins from the foundational premise that the Constitution is a fixed contractual delegation created by the sovereign […]

Summary: Agents in Rebellion argues that the modern government of Massachusetts has progressively departed from the fixed constitutional structure established in the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 and has instead evolved into an administrative system operating outside the lawful chain of delegated authority. The work is written from a strict constructionist and natural-law perspective and contends […]

Summary: Replaced by Fiat examines how American courts have gradually displaced a legal order grounded in common-law adjudication, fixed jurisdiction, and constitutional rights with one increasingly governed by procedural rulemaking and institutional self-validation. Its central claim is that this transformation did not occur through formal repeal of constitutional law, but through the procedural reconfiguration of […]

Summary The Administrative State and the Quiet Supersession of the Constitution explains how constitutional government was not openly abolished, but gradually displaced in function by an administrative system that preserved constitutional form while replacing constitutional rule. Its central claim is that the modern administrative state does not merely regulate within the constitutional order; it increasingly […]